جزئیات آسیب‌پذیری

CVE-2023-54121

Linux Linux

btrfs: fix incorrect splitting in btrfs_drop_extent_map_range

CVSS 3.1
7.8بالا

شرح رسمی (انگلیسی)

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix incorrect splitting in btrfs_drop_extent_map_range In production we were seeing a variety of WARN_ON()'s in the extent_map code, specifically in btrfs_drop_extent_map_range() when we have to call add_extent_mapping() for our second split. Consider the following extent map layout PINNED [0 16K) [32K, 48K) and then we call btrfs_drop_extent_map_range for [0, 36K), with skip_pinned == true. The initial loop will have start = 0 end = 36K len = 36K we will find the [0, 16k) extent, but since we are pinned we will skip it, which has this code start = em_end; if (end != (u64)-1) len = start + len - em_end; em_end here is 16K, so now the values are start = 16K len = 16K + 36K - 16K = 36K len should instead be 20K. This is a problem when we find the next extent at [32K, 48K), we need to split this extent to leave [36K, 48k), however the code for the split looks like this split->start = start + len; split->len = em_end - (start + len); In this case we have em_end = 48K split->start = 16K + 36K // this should be 16K + 20K split->len = 48K - (16K + 36K) // this overflows as 16K + 36K is 52K and now we have an invalid extent_map in the tree that potentially overlaps other entries in the extent map. Even in the non-overlapping case we will have split->start set improperly, which will cause problems with any block related calculations. We don't actually need len in this loop, we can simply use end as our end point, and only adjust start up when we find a pinned extent we need to skip. Adjust the logic to do this, which keeps us from inserting an invalid extent map. We only skip_pinned in the relocation case, so this is relatively rare, except in the case where you are running relocation a lot, which can happen with auto relocation on.

امتیازهای CVSS

امتیازنسخهمنبعبردار
7.8بالا 3.1 CVEProject cvelistV5 (CNA) (Linux) CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

محصولات آسیب‌پذیر

فروشندهمحصولنسخه‌هامنبع
Linux Linux 2.6.33 CVEProject cvelistV5 (CNA)
Linux Linux c87afd35a28b2661a2626a1b28e9fd69adcad9f9 CVEProject cvelistV5 (CNA)
Linux Linux 2.6.32.19 ≤ v < 2.6.33 CVEProject cvelistV5 (CNA)
Linux Linux 55ef68990029fcd8d04d42fc184aa7fb18cf309e ≤ v < 9f68e2105dd96cf0fafffffafb2337fbd0fbae1f CVEProject cvelistV5 (CNA)
Linux Linux 55ef68990029fcd8d04d42fc184aa7fb18cf309e ≤ v < b43a4c99d878cf5e59040e45c96bb0a8358bfb3b CVEProject cvelistV5 (CNA)
Linux Linux 55ef68990029fcd8d04d42fc184aa7fb18cf309e ≤ v < c962098ca4af146f2625ed64399926a098752c9c CVEProject cvelistV5 (CNA)

منابع و راهنماها

۳
هشدار CVEهای بعدی این محصولمحصول را دنبال کنید تا آسیب‌پذیری‌های تازه را در تلگرام بگیرید.

اطلاعات

تاریخ انتشار
۱۴۰۴/۱۰/۰۳
آخرین به‌روزرسانی
۱۴۰۵/۰۵/۱۴
وضعیت
منتشرشده
صادرکننده (CNA)
Linux

پیش‌بینی بهره‌برداری (EPSS)

۰٫۱۶٪
احتمال بهره‌برداری در ۳۰ روز
۵٫۵٪
صدک (نسبت به همه‌ی CVEها)

ضعف‌ها (CWE)

  • —