Vulnerability details

CVE-2026-64113

Linux Linux

ixgbevf: fix use-after-free in VEPA multicast source pruning

CVSS 3.1
9.8Critical

Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ixgbevf: fix use-after-free in VEPA multicast source pruning ixgbevf_clean_rx_irq() prunes frames whose source MAC matches the VF's own address (VEPA multicast workaround) by freeing the skb and continuing to the next descriptor: dev_kfree_skb_irq(skb); continue; The skb pointer is declared outside the while loop and persists across iterations. Because the continue skips the "skb = NULL" reset at the bottom of the loop, the next iteration enters the "else if (skb)" path and calls ixgbevf_add_rx_frag() on the freed skb, dereferencing skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags - a use-after-free in NAPI softirq context. The sibling driver iavf already handles this correctly by nulling the pointer before continuing. Apply the same pattern here. I do not have ixgbevf hardware; the bug was found by static analysis (scan_drop_continue_loops.py + semgrep drop_continue_in_loop, multi-tool corroboration with the highest score in the scan). The UAF was confirmed under KASAN by loading a test module that reproduces the exact code pattern (alloc skb, kfree_skb, then read skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags): BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in ixgbevf_uaf_test_init+0x100/0x1000 Read of size 8 at addr 000000006163ae78 by task insmod/30 freed 208-byte region [000000006163adc0, 000000006163ae90) QEMU emulates igb (82576) but not ixgbe (82599), and the igbvf VF driver does not include the VEPA source pruning path, so a full end-to-end reproduction with emulated hardware was not possible.

CVSS scores

ScoreVersionSourceVector
9.8Critical 3.1 CVEProject cvelistV5 (CNA) (Linux) CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Affected products

VendorProductVersionsSource
Linux Linux 3.19 CVEProject cvelistV5 (CNA)
Linux Linux bad17234ba702a50aeec50ab04724ee58af89607 ≤ v < 6ef30384a50a50e4a484cddf341bc27de31aa3de CVEProject cvelistV5 (CNA)
Linux Linux bad17234ba702a50aeec50ab04724ee58af89607 ≤ v < 55b3e91d62b2f7a24109b2d7c9f4c66d2e3b1ec1 CVEProject cvelistV5 (CNA)
Linux Linux bad17234ba702a50aeec50ab04724ee58af89607 ≤ v < add70e2682c0ad3be2a5810bcf1bc13963ba4df9 CVEProject cvelistV5 (CNA)
Linux Linux bad17234ba702a50aeec50ab04724ee58af89607 ≤ v < 3d931ac62411a7e43b85dba5fe45e1a4a91bd5cb CVEProject cvelistV5 (CNA)
Linux Linux bad17234ba702a50aeec50ab04724ee58af89607 ≤ v < dfef79e09ed2f5df975c98547f97f5d7f8982a24 CVEProject cvelistV5 (CNA)
Linux Linux bad17234ba702a50aeec50ab04724ee58af89607 ≤ v < e8768bcbe5cd30c4ea36a22022c9ffaa66903693 CVEProject cvelistV5 (CNA)
Linux Linux bad17234ba702a50aeec50ab04724ee58af89607 ≤ v < 5d49b568c188dc77199d8d2b959c91da8cc27cf1 CVEProject cvelistV5 (CNA)
Linux Linux bad17234ba702a50aeec50ab04724ee58af89607 ≤ v < a244395d8c563ed1bb26c3ef708db6aeeaa08084 CVEProject cvelistV5 (CNA)

References and advisories

8
Alerts for this product's next CVEsFollow the product to get new vulnerabilities on Telegram.

Details

Published
2026-07-19
Last updated
2026-10-19
State
Published
Assigner (CNA)
Linux

Exploit prediction (EPSS)

0.52%
Probability of exploitation in 30 days
44.8%
Percentile (among all CVEs)

SSVC assessment (CISA)

Automatable
Yes
Exploitation
None
Technical impact
Total

Weaknesses (CWE)

  • CWE-416
    Use After Free