Vulnerability details
CVE-2025-7394
Official description
In the OpenSSL compatibility layer implementation, the function RAND_poll() was not behaving as expected and leading to the potential for predictable values returned from RAND_bytes() after fork() is called. This can lead to weak or predictable random numbers generated in applications that are both using RAND_bytes() and doing fork() operations. This only affects applications explicitly calling RAND_bytes() after fork() and does not affect any internal TLS operations. Although RAND_bytes() documentation in OpenSSL calls out not being safe for use with fork() without first calling RAND_poll(), an additional code change was also made in wolfSSL to make RAND_bytes() behave similar to OpenSSL after a fork() call without calling RAND_poll(). Now the Hash-DRBG used gets reseeded after detecting running in a new process. If making use of RAND_bytes() and calling fork() we recommend updating to the latest version of wolfSSL. Thanks to Per Allansson from Appgate for the report.
CVSS scores
| Score | Version | Source | Vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.0High | 4.0 | CVEProject cvelistV5 (CNA) (wolfSSL) | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N |
Affected products
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| wolfSSL | wolfSSL | 3.15.0 ≤ v ≤ 5.8.0 | CVEProject cvelistV5 (CNA) |
References and advisories
1Details
- Published
- 2025-07-19
- Last updated
- 2025-07-21
- State
- Published
- Assigner (CNA)
- wolfSSL
Exploit prediction (EPSS)
SSVC assessment (CISA)
- Automatable
- No
- Exploitation
- None
- Technical impact
- Partial
Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-200Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor