Vulnerability details

CVE-2025-7394

wolfSSL wolfSSL
CVSS 4.0
7.0High

Official description

In the OpenSSL compatibility layer implementation, the function RAND_poll() was not behaving as expected and leading to the potential for predictable values returned from RAND_bytes() after fork() is called. This can lead to weak or predictable random numbers generated in applications that are both using RAND_bytes() and doing fork() operations. This only affects applications explicitly calling RAND_bytes() after fork() and does not affect any internal TLS operations. Although RAND_bytes() documentation in OpenSSL calls out not being safe for use with fork() without first calling RAND_poll(), an additional code change was also made in wolfSSL to make RAND_bytes() behave similar to OpenSSL after a fork() call without calling RAND_poll(). Now the Hash-DRBG used gets reseeded after detecting running in a new process. If making use of RAND_bytes() and calling fork() we recommend updating to the latest version of wolfSSL. Thanks to Per Allansson from Appgate for the report.

CVSS scores

ScoreVersionSourceVector
7.0High 4.0 CVEProject cvelistV5 (CNA) (wolfSSL) CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N

Affected products

VendorProductVersionsSource
wolfSSL wolfSSL 3.15.0 ≤ v ≤ 5.8.0 CVEProject cvelistV5 (CNA)

References and advisories

1
Kolun on Telegram @kolunsec Exploited CVEs, key news and a daily digest Alerts for this product's next CVEsFollow the product to get new vulnerabilities on Telegram.

Details

Published
2025-07-19
Last updated
2025-07-21
State
Published
Assigner (CNA)
wolfSSL

Exploit prediction (EPSS)

0.45%
Probability of exploitation in 30 days
39.9%
Percentile (among all CVEs)

SSVC assessment (CISA)

Automatable
No
Exploitation
None
Technical impact
Partial

Weaknesses (CWE)

  • CWE-200
    Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor